Search for: "DOE Corporations 1-20"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 5,249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
World Triathlon Corporation, d.b.a. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
See 15 USC Section 1. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
Are Large Nursing Home Chains Intentionally Attempting To Deceive The Public When It Comes To Corporate Ownership? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:01 am
Are Large Nursing Home Chains Intentionally Attempting To Deceive The Public When It Comes To Corporate Ownership? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
The House of Lords in the British Broadcasting Corporation case [2010] 1 AC 145 appeared to be in no doubt that Article 8 conferred a right to reputation that must be balanced, in an appropriate case, against the rights conferred by Article 10: see Lord Hope at [22] and [28] and Lord Brown at [69]. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
A new CDC study released last week finds that incidence of Type 2 diabetes could grow from 1 in 10 people today to an astounding 1 in 3 by 2050. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Two other points of interest: 1. the court does not wade into the issue of whether there are any exceptions to sovereign immunity beyond those set out in the statute (para. 24), and 2. the court accepts the factual findings of the English decision as part of its analysis, prior to concluding that the decision is enforceable in Canada (para. 34). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
Like so many other so-called progressive scholars who view most corporate leaders like the satanic spawn of Gordon Gecko or Mr. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
Specifically, ALJ Bullock found that (1) Respondents’ accused products did not infringe claims 1-8 of U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:13 pm
Plans that are corrected in accordance with Notice 2010-6 before 2011 may be treated as having been corrected on January 1, 2009 which can mean that any requirement of income inclusion under 409A as a condition of the relief (as mentioned in the preceding paragraph) would generally not apply. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
The defendants in these actions are not identified – and we assume that they were not against Facebook itself (as this is a US Corporation protected by the “SPEECH” Act). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
But as any former partner at Arthur Andersen LLP — once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms — could attest, an outside professional (and especially an auditor) whose corporate client experiences a rapid or disastrous decline in fortune precipitated by insider fraud does not skate away unscathed. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:50 pm
Section 951 of the Reform Act requires that publicly held corporations provide their shareholders with the ability to render separate votes to approve: (1) executive compensation, (2) the frequency of shareholder Say-on-Pay votes, and on (3) golden parachute arrangements for the company's named executive officers ("NEOs") in connection with merger/acquisition transactions ("M&A"). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
That kind of jurisdiction requires "substantial" contact, and is usually limited to the residence of an individual or state of incorporation or principal place of business of a corporation. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
In the Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
1. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:46 am
So, how does one confidently allocate between stocks and bonds? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Wang, a resident of Taiwan and the former vice president of sales and marketing of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, is charged with participating in the conspiracy from at least as early as September 14, 2001, and continuing at least until December 1, 2006. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Wang, a resident of Taiwan and the former vice president of sales and marketing of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, is charged with participating in the conspiracy from at least as early as September 14, 2001, and continuing at least until December 1, 2006. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:21 pm
A decision under s. 79(1) of the Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act must be appealed to the Court of Queen's Bench. [read post]
