Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 4,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2008, 9:33 am
In Halpin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:28 am
Bhd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
But the recent introduction of notebook computers equipped exclusively with SSDs suggests that HDD's market dominance may end within a few years. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:16 am
.'" Id. at 6, quoting Group Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:46 am
Case Name: Jenkins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 8:18 pm
Glenn v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:40 pm
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
[18] NFL Enter. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
LEXIS 3559 (March 15, 2006), cert. denied, Moores v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:00 pm
It must be an account of why changes in constitutional doctrine over time- which largely occur outside of Article V amendment and are not in the control of any single person, much less any single judge- are legitimate. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
Indeed, Masimo recovered $134 million in a patent infringement case against their dominant rivals, who had promptly infringed Masimo's patent after the product's introduction. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:35 am
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:49 pm
One important factor contributing to the change is attributable to State Street Bank and Trust Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For its argument, the Bush administration relies on a post-invasion Security Council Resolution on the reconstruction of Iraq, as well as a 1948 SCOTUS case, called Hirota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:20 am
Thus, this Court has crafted a set of doctrines regulating punitive damages and preempting state laws that seem anomalous if one believed that the Court should respect popular democracy. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
District Court to one count of conspiring to bribe a state judge. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 11:43 pm
From 1921 in Adkins v. [read post]
