Search for: "Daniel v. Daniel" Results 4301 - 4320 of 7,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2021, 10:29 am by Ben Allen
The Court held the district court correctly analyzed the four-factor test for granting a motion to withdraw as set out in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:08 am
HIIT Peloton classes and our fav teachers Hanna Frankson and Jen Sherman on the bike and Daniel McKenna for strength. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
The IPKat is delighted to host a guest opinion on the so called ‘TRIPS waiver’ by Prof Daniel Gervais. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 2:29 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
ComentariosEdison Joselito Naranjo Luzuriaga & Diego Mauricio Bonilla Jurado, El problema de los derechos económicos de los pueblos indígenas en el Convenio 169 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo Víctor Manuel Rojas Amandi, El nuevo estatus jurídico del ius cogens, reflexiones en torno a los informes de la Comisión de Derecho Internacional Rodrigo Machado Franco, A obrigação de não-reconhecimento de um ato… [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am by Steve Kalar
 Brave case of first impression brings intellectually-rigorous analysis to – challenging – sentencing fact pattern.United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The World Trademark Review's blog caught the Kat's eye earlier this week with news that President Barack Obama has taken time off from his golfing commitments to nominate a new IP czar (technically "Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator"), Kilpatrick Townsend's Daniel Marti, though Merpel thinks he got back to the links in time to avoid choosing a new Director for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am by Florian Mueller
The Australian court is concerned because it's currently holding an extensive Samsung v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
Still on the subject of patents, Penny Gilbert writes a guest piece on The SPC Blog on prospects for patent term extensions for veterinary vaccines in light of the EFTA Court ruling in Pharmaq v Intervet, while the same blog records a most unusual event these days -- an action concerning supplementary protection certificates which the trial judge refuses to send to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling (Viiv v Teva, here).The INTA is coming ... and… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:51 am by Sophie Corke
Walt Disney Company | The Chalk Pencil infringement claims have been erased: Lanard Toys v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:30 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed whether the penalties assessed against a defendant under the False Claims Act ("FCA") can ever violate the 8th Amendment's protection against "excessive fines" in the appeal, United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]