Search for: "David Reader" Results 4301 - 4320 of 8,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by SHG
If this feed is not via RSS reader or Newstex, it infringes the copyright. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:10 am by INFORRM
Curiously, when Sir David English stepped down as editor of the Mail 20 years ago, the circumstances were similar in some ways. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The school became involved when administrators learned of the site on the same day that a reader, unbeknownst to the students, posted a racial slur in the comments section of the blog. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Stefan Bird-Pollan
David James, Fichte’s Social and Political Philosophy: Property and Virtue. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:32 am by Benjamin Wittes
In addition to the formal responses, the Daily Mail Newspaper published an article in February by a senior Conservative politician, David Davis MP, who suggested that the Government’s proposals would be more fitting of regimes like Syria, Iran and North Korea. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Bernstein discusses (and asks readers for suggestions on) which Court cases have the most “ridiculous reasoning. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:06 am by Hopkins
David Strayer (University of Utah) and his associates have conducted very indepth research and testing in the area of distracted driving. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:06 am by Hopkins
David Strayer (University of Utah) and his associates have conducted very indepth research and testing in the area of distracted driving. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:43 pm by David Bernstein
Readers favorite examples of similar addled reasoning are welcome in the comments. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm by Walter Olson
From Glenn Reynolds’s readers: “Rather hilariously, David Dow, the author of the Newsweek piece calling for the impeachment of the Supreme Court if they overturn the health care law, is the author of America’s Prophets: How Judicial Activism Makes America Great. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:37 am by Ted Folkman
Dornan also suggested that the court should apply the Intel factors, familiar to readers of this blog as the factors that apply to requests for judicial assistance under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:24 am by Glenn Reynolds
And another reader emails: “Rather hilariously, David Dow, the author of the Newsweek piece calling for the impeachment of the Supreme Court if they overturn the health care law, is the author of America’s Prophets: How Judicial Activism Makes America Great.” Only the right sort of judicial activism. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/Hbj3eK (Ignatius Grande) The eDiscovery “Passport”: The First Step to Succeeding in International Legal Disputes - bit.ly/H8DHw4 (Philip Favro) The Security, Privacy and Legal Implications of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) - bit.ly/Hnw5Hg (David Navetta) Third Circuit Finds That Failing to Produce Original Documents May Constitute Sanctionable Spoliation -bit.ly/Hg7qHE (Gibbons) Troll Models | Millnet… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Ken
Here's how she plans to respond to her critics: And now Kashmir Hill of Forbes, David Carr of the New York Times, Marc Randazza, Kenneth P. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am by Lawrence Higgins
(Patently-O readers register with PO 200 for a discount). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm by David Bernstein
When a reader sent me these links, my initial inclination was to defend the president. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:44 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The technology consists of monitoring devices such as cameras, license-plate readers for squad cars and tracking equipment" for use in bait cars and other "bait" items. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Steve Vladeck
-area readers, AU’s student-run National Security Law Brief is hosting its annual symposium this Thursday here at the Washington College of Law. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday, when Senator David Norris (pictured right) introduced a Privacy Bill, 2012 into the Seanad, the debate focussed largely on media invasions of privacy, with little recognition of the massive privacy issues attendant upon the modern regulatory state and increasing law enforcement powers (to say nothing of widespread private surveillance or the aggregation of data by private corporations). [read post]