Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 4301 - 4320 of 12,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am by Jason Rantanen
As known to most patent practitioners,[i] a parent provisional does not lock in a priority date for a child non-provisional unless the parent provisional provides a written description and enablement of an invention that is claimed in the child non-provisional. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
Interestingly enough, in Jancik v Redbox the defendants conceded that their DVD rental kiosks were places of public accommodation subject to Title III of the ADA. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
Readers worrying that Justice Neil Gorsuch is hogging time at oral argument may find more cause for concern when I lead with his “where’s the beef” quip from today’s argument in Patchak v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The Ninth Circuit thought that the defendant was entitled to the original, erroneous deal.Supreme Court precedent does not clearly say that, though. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm by Shu-Yi Oei
As Diane and I argued in Leak-Driven Law, we think it’s important to responsibly parse through these nuances and differences in reacting to these leaks and making policy. [read post]