Search for: "Does 1-80" Results 4301 - 4320 of 6,385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
q=Appointment+to+positions+in+New+York+State%E2%80%99s+Civil+Service   Arbitrator rules that qualified retirees and future retirees to have the same health insurance coverage as the employer's active employees http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2017/2017_08107.htm Arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's power … [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Imagine 20% confusion in a survey, but everyone was only somewhat sure, while 80% are not confused at all and are absolutely certain. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:50 am by Law Office of Jason M. Hatfield
Whether it’s an insurance company or a self-insured employer, it does not matter. [read post]
16 May 2024, 8:09 am by Chiara Giorgetti
In itself, the Register does not have an adjudicative function, nor does it determine responsibility or allocate payments or compensation. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:56 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The OSC also confirmed that the business judgment rule does not apply to decisions regarding disclosure under the Securities Act. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
In proceedings under § 623 involving corporations (but not LLCs and limited partnerships), simultaneous with the required offer to the dissenting shareholder the company must tender 80% of the offered price. [read post]
Sandford, 80 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1867), argued in defense of President Andrew Johnson, the Constitution refers to impeachment in seven places—references (emphasis supplied) which taken together suggest a legal proceeding to try a criminal offense: (1) the Impeachment Clause’s reference to “Conviction” for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors “; (2) the Senate’s power “to try all Impeachments” (Art. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:22 pm
Because arbitration does NOT lead to a fair money award for the consumer/employee. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
The question is, does A have a valid claim against B to recover a share of the re-sale profits? [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:03 am by tshadduck
Whether it’s an insurance company or a self-insured employer, it does not matter. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm by Ilya Somin
The repeal of Prohibition in 1933 and the abolition of price controls in the 1970s and 80s were great success stories of this type. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
By contrast, Australia does not require any certification. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Shetty (June 18, 2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1488, a purchaser defrauded an 80-year-old seller into signing documents that cause the home to be sold, and that failed to include the disclosure requirements of HESCA. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Joshua Thompson and Ralph Kasarda
The Court held that Section 4(a)(1) of the ADEA – which makes it unlawful to “refuse” to hire on the basis of age – encompasses intentional discrimination claims, not disparate impact claims. [read post]
  The regulations provide detailed requirements for investors seeking to qualify for the tax benefits provided from an investment in one of the over 8,700 designated Opportunity Zones, codified as Sections 1400Z-1, and 1400Z-2 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]