Search for: "EMPLOYERS GROUP"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 44,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2013, 3:32 pm
In any event, this "collaring" is just another indication of the way technology is shaping employment management [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
Group legal premiums can be paid either by the individual, shared between the employer and employee, or paid entirely by the employer. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
Group legal premiums can be paid either by the individual, shared between the employer and employee, or paid entirely by the employer. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Our colleagues at the Workers Injury Law & Advocacy Group (WILG) provided information in an article posted in today's Huffington Post about reform of workers' compensation laws. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:32 pm
It will also help employers who need to respond to employee complaints of harassment. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:34 am
For instance, in our rail industry a lone worker is defined in 49 CFR 214.7 as “… an individual roadway worker who is not being afforded on-track safety by another roadway worker, who is not a member of a roadway work group, and who is not engaged in a common task with another roadway worker. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:45 pm
According to an Associated Press article from April 22nd, business groups are practically giddy about the potential to alter North Carolina workers’ compensation laws to reduce employer costs and set limits and constraints. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:24 pm
Until quite recently, self-funding was generally seen as an option only for relatively large employer groups. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:07 am
Judge Barker’s Decision Vacating the 2023 Joint Employer Rule The Final Rule came before Judge Barker via a lawsuit initiated by the United States Chamber of Commerce (“the Chamber”)—and a coalition of business groups—alleging the rule was arbitrary and capricious, and therefore unlawful, in part because it fails to articulate a comprehensible standard and ignores serious practical problems. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:14 am
OWBPA Disclosures Finally, the guidelines provide that an employer is required to disclose the following information to employees age 40 and over who are being laid off as part of an exit incentive or other termination program: The decisional unit, which is the class, unit, or group of employees from which the employer chose the employees who were and were not selected for the program. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:14 am
OWBPA Disclosures Finally, the guidelines provide that an employer is required to disclose the following information to employees age 40 and over who are being laid off as part of an exit incentive or other termination program: The decisional unit, which is the class, unit, or group of employees from which the employer chose the employees who were and were not selected for the program. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:24 am
For more information about upcoming speaking engagements featuring the attorneys of The Employment Law Group® law firm, click here. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
Dave Scher, both Principals at The Employment Law Group® law firm. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm
Dave Scher, both Principals at The Employment Law Group® law firm. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
In recent years, factions of the Oath Keepers and III%—also known as the Three Percenters—have begun leveraging nonprofit statuses to evade taxes on property, income, sales, and employment. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:15 am
Our Legal Protector Plan is the Best Any employer wants to provide a group legal plan that gives real assistance to employees. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
The IRS and HHS have now warned plans that they will fix the calculator, and the definition:"[C]ertain group health plan benefit designs that do not provide coverage for in-patient hospitalization services are being promoted to employers. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:47 am
In particular, the NLRB found no evidence that Guard Publishing had ever permitted e-mails, such as the ones at issue in the case, that urged support for groups or organizations. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:53 pm
University Health Network[1], the Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently discontinued an interim injunction[2] that had been granted to provisionally preserve the employment status of a group of unionized and non-unionized employees who were subject to the potential termination of their employment for failing to comply with the employer’s mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 12:00 am
Employers needing guidance should contact any member of Henderson Franklin’s Employment Law Group, I may be reached at john.marra@henlaw.com or by phone at 239-344-1263. [read post]
