Search for: "House v. State" Results 4301 - 4320 of 25,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
  The typical upsides and downsides of living in California are well-known; for the former, awesome weather, great beaches, cool citizenry (for the most part), etc., and high housing costs and tax rates (inter alia) for the latter.But what I really felt strongly when I read today's opinion -- which is by no means an exceptional or unusual one, I might add -- was just how much I like living in a state that has a supreme court like ours. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:48 am by Giles Peaker
Camfield & Ors v Uyiekpen & Anor (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER – evidence – pro forma witness statements) (2022) UKUT 234 (LC) An appeal from an FTT decision dismissing an application for a rent repayment order, which shows the importance of establishing ALL the elements of a relevant offence, while also providing a snapshot of the horrorshow that is ‘get rich quick’ rent to rent set ups. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Writing for the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Luis v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:19 pm
It looks like it kept the all the Amendments to the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act as it was passed by the House Financial Services Committee. ------------ TITLE V-CAPITAL MARKETS Subtitle A-Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act SEC. 5001. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:23 pm by Walter Olson
” [Joshua Thompson, PLF, earlier here, here] Freedom to Discriminate in Choice of Roommates: 9th Circuit case of Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The Outer House and Inner House judges disagreed on the scope of the objection In the Outer House the case was heard by Lady Smith (Doogan v Greater Glasgow Health Board [2012] CSOH 32, 2012 SLT 1041). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:46 am
London Borough of Lewisham -v- Litchmore. 2 October 2009, Bromley County Court Since the beginning of replacement tenancies on May 2009, there have, rather surprisingly, not been any reports on cases involving the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 Schedule 11 s.21 – when the new tenancy and the original tenancy are to be treated as the same and continuous for the purposes of a relevant claim (for breach of tenancy condition or statutory duty). [read post]