Search for: "Kat"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 6,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Kat prefers cleaning the old fashioned way... [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
BackgroundThis reference originated in the context of litigation between Hewlett-Packard (HP) and collective management rights organisation Reprobel.In 2004 the latter informed HP that the sale of multifunction devices entailed payment of a levy of EUR 49.20 per printer, and - from what this Kat understands - this should apply retrospectively. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
This Kat hopes you enjoyed the first instalment of her coverage of CIPIL 2020. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:56 am
This first step (“The first step is to identify the inventive concept embodied in the patent in suit”) of the structured approach to assessing inventive step in Pozzoli Spa v BDMO SA & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 588 has always seemed to this Kat like a distracting red herring, since the “inventive concept” ought to be the invention as defined in the claims. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
Both Kats fancy that there will be an appeal ...How to pronounce Bruichladdich [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm
The FIFA World Cup has only been up and running for a couple of weeks, and it seems to this Kat that numerous people are becoming quite sick and tired of it. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Kat-inspired artistic adaptationsFollowing an unsuccessful outcome at first instance, Pictoright won before the ’s-Hertogenbosch Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
With the fate of dance in copyright law catching interest in the press world-wide, this Kat decided to play some more with this improbable duet. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:57 pm
Here the IPKat hosts the third in the series of posts from London-based law firm Bristows (where guest Kat Tom works) on its real-time experiment in litigating before the proposed Unified Patent Court (UPC). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
This Kat is concerned that these are couched in entirely permissive (“The Court may…” and “the Court shall have discretion to”) rather than mandatory language. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:43 am
All that really differs, it appears to this Kat, is how much the EPO is prepared to permit the need for onerous trial-and-error on behalf of the skilled person attempting to perform the claimed invention. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:03 pm
He considers that trade mark cases are the most fun, including the Kit-Kat case and color trade mark cases, which are pushing the limits of protection to trade mark law. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 2:35 am
As commented by the Kat back in 2018, the case law on "mode of action" is difficult to make sense of (IPKat). [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
* 500 and counting: websites blocked by order of UK courtsFormer guest Kat Darren Meale has blown the dust off his abacus and actually totted up how many websites British browsers aren't supposed to be able to reach any more, due to blocking injunctions.* Je t'aime ... [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:55 am
A further comment has been received by a correspondent known to this Kat, who has had many years' experience as a senior brand manager with a well-known brand and who has requested anonymity for professional purposes but who has this to say: "''It is not surprising that Mr Roughton has had 25 years of pleas for concrete and reliable statistics and values of loss in respect of counterfeits go unanswered. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:05 am
The first time these Kats read the decision’s conclusions, they were under the impression that that the answer of the CJEU was in the negative. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
The AmeriKat's view during Sunday evening'sUPC session Sunday late afternoon sessions are generally a killer for attendance as conference participants are either exploring the sites or getting in a quick Kat nap before evening festivities. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
However, as Kat friend Matthieu Dhenne explains in the following guest report, it nevertheless provides interesting discussions on essentiality and the application of the new French Trade Secrets Act (following the implementation of the EU Trade Secrets Directive - see Kat posts here).Over to Matthieu who reports from Paris:"Are French courts ready to rule on FRAND? [read post]
