Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 28,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
Very few states require some sort of meaningful period of employment, and Illinois' "substantial period of time" rule is perhaps the most well-developed line of cases that forges a pragmatic path.Though I say the cases are well-developed, they could certainly be clearer. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:16 am
Bottom line: What's been proposed here are not realistic suggestions based on historical costs and caseloads. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
US v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:40 pm
Much discussion of the Wickard v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
We often see contracts containing wording along the lines of: “This Agreement may not be amended, except by the mutual written agreement of the Parties. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:39 am
Parents for Privacy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Jonathan Adler notes the “unusual line-up[s]” in Lucia and Wayfair. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
Worse, they have made an interest-free loan of $2,500 to the applicable federal or state government. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:49 am
State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 3:26 pm
Ethics, State Bar of Tex., Op. 39 (1978).) [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
Supreme Court issued an order inviting the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views fo the United States in NEDC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced its decision — but no opinion — in Washington v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
At oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:45 am
On 9/1/09, the NC State Court Of Appeals released an unpublished decision in the case of Duffy v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
Lydia Krebs won in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:55 pm
Zynga Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
This was the latest opinion in the long-running case, Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:02 am
See Happel v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 9:57 am
But the plaintiff’s home state is irrelevant under Walden v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
