Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 4301 - 4320 of 5,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" "New York City is well on its way to becoming the tech capital of the world," said Council Speaker Christine C. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Gmlevine
New York has a similar law General Business Law, Art. 9-C,§ 148 (Cyber Piracy Protections; Domain Names). [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:51 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  Once the parties agree, the exhibits are marked and should go into evidence without the need for authentication of other testimony. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
European and Community trade mark watchers will probably know that an appeal to the Court of Justice has been lodged in Case C-327/11 United States Polo Association v OHIM. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm by admin
  With the mandated grading curve system, students are not motivated to learn, but rather, to climb over each other, pushing others down in pursuit of the few good marks the system allows. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
In other words, this is a bit of a Case C-59/08 COPAD v Dior, isn't it?] [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
The value of an apology in China (IPKat) An ABC to losing your China IP (China Law Blog)   Europe CJEU: Interpreation of Enforcement Directive: Realchemie v Bayer (EPLAW) CJEU confirms validity of case-law regarding distinctive character of 3D trademarks which consist of appearance of product itself or packaging of a good: C-344/10 and C-345/10 (Class 46) Highlights of CJEU decision in PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic C-281/10 (Class 99) EU database of IP… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:38 am
Last week's ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
 Back in Europe, Sophie C. van Loon (Kennedy van der Laan) dissects the ECJ's "who pays for the levy on unrecorded media? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm by Michael C. Smith
Good articles all - the principal caveat I'd provide is one the paper did as well - it included the false marking cases in some of the statistics (because until this year the court did as well) so be careful about relying on 2010 filing numbers without backing out the false marking cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:27 pm by Bruno Tarabichi
CONSENT TO REGISTER – SECTION 2(c) REFUSAL Connection with Goods/Services – TMEP §1206.02  The standard for determining whether the individual bearing the name in the mark will be associated with the mark as used on the goods/services is that: (1) the person is so well known that the public would reasonably assume a connection between the person and the goods/services; or (2) the individual is publicly connected with the… [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:52 am
Even so, we know that not all are of one mind and that some in good faith will disagree with this decision. [read post]