Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm
And as he narrates in volume one of Outside In, the starkest experiences of being an outsider came in his family’s transition to life in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
—Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, 470). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Defendant, a large agricultural cooperative, sells butter and other dairy products throughout the United States, and has used the LAND O LAKES mark since the 1920s. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Bausch & Lomb, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Release of false marking claims applies to all products marked with patent mumbers: Simonian v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 2:38 pm
In Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court’s recent decision in Bulwer v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:10 pm
On notice, Mr Hanson could be shown to have complained to the claimants about cold in the unit and the state of repair in December 2019. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Highlights this week included: Lego brick cannot be registered as a trade mark, rules ECJ: Lego Juris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled this Wednesday that section 3 of DOMA violates the Constitution. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
Justice Department event marking the 50th anniversary of the high court's landmark Gideon v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Nuvasive, Inc., et. al (Docket Report) TransData – In smart meter patent suit TransData focuses antennae on Texas utility: TransData v Denton County Electric Cooperative (Green Patent Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court Maryland: Guess confusion isn’t such a big deal: Chattery Interanational v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
One significant source of uncertainty is that minimum unit pricing may encourage retailers to purchase cheaper products due to the mark-up. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 9:02 am
, this month marks the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:05 am
” [City of South Bend v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
Hurley Mark R. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
" But in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
In Binder, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) focused on whether Plaintiffs had ownership of the trademarks and whether Defendants' use of the trademark through Google’s AdWords program was "likely to cause confusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:56 pm
For example, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, in Chen v. [read post]
