Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith" Results 4301 - 4320 of 10,931
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
  The combined expansions of criminal coverage and the heightened severity of punishments are matters of grave concern that call for a serious rethinking of this project. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
The matter came on for trial on 23 July 2014 in Person County Superior Court, the Honorable W. [read post]
11 May 2016, 7:11 am by Editors
” Read: A Take on the 2016 AmLaw 100 at Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:45 am
         This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
Smith focuses on the pending case of Georgia death row inmate Timothy Foster; he argues that, although it “seems likely the court will grant Foster a new trial,” “it’s hard to imagine even a favorable Supreme Court ruling in his case fixing the biggest problem with the death penalty itself:   Even in 2016, its use remains inextricably, hopelessly intertwined with our national legacy of racial bias and exclusion. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:45 am by Bernie Burk
 Sometimes the firm with fading ardor (or that has altered in its appetites to cherry-picking from devouring the entire tree, deadwood and all) matter-of-factly reveals that discussions are over, or in some odd cases suggests they never began. [read post]
7 May 2016, 8:25 am
This is not a matter of politics — I have voted for Obama twice. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:36 am by Brian Cordery
€ 190 The post What is a “practical interest” in the subject matter of an invention? [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:10 am by Bruce Ackerman
This lawlessness has made it impossible for Captain Smith to determine whether his present mission is inconsistent with his oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States,” thus requiring him to seek an independent determination of this matter from the Court. 4. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Since the Defendant in this matter was a podiatrist, the MCARE Act was found to be inapplicable and the qualifications for expert witness were to be judged under the more lenient standards set forth under common law pertaining to qualified experts. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:03 am by Jack Goldsmith
 But I seriously doubt matters will turn out this way. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:01 pm by Jason Rantanen
Lastly, even if a court decides it is possible for the government to take patents by subjecting them to more stringent post-issuance review, Dolin and Manta’s argument almost certainly loses as a matter of takings doctrine. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:29 am by John Rubin
In 2009, the General Assembly completed the circle for superior court matters, giving defendants open-file discovery in noncapital post-conviction cases once they have counsel. [read post]