Search for: "Morris's Case" Results 4301 - 4320 of 5,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 11:57 am by Mintz & Geftic, LLC
If you or a loved one has been injured while working , call us today at 908-352-2323 or send us email by clicking here to evaluate your case. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
Philip Morris, Inc., 55 USPQ2d 1585 (TTAB 2000) (denying motion to dismiss claim under Pan American Convention in part because Convention is self-executing). [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:04 pm by Maggy Baccinelli
DeBruicker, partner at Duane Morris LLP, said: “Own it. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:58 am by PaulKostro
To establish a prima facie case of defamation, a plaintiff must present proof tending to establish each of the following elements: 1) defendant made a defamatory statement of fact about the plaintiff; 2) the statement was false; 3) the statement was communicated to a third party; and 4) defendant made the statement while either knowing that it was false, or while failing to exercise due care to ascertain the truth or falsity of the statement. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 7:12 am by Jessie Canon
As a lawyer and clinical teacher, he was “a model for what it means to be dedicated to a case and, especially, to a client,” said Douglas Frenkel, Morris Shuster practice professor of law. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:24 am by PaulKostro
.), certif. denied, 134 N.J. 567 (1993); see also Brett, supra, 144 N.J. at 504 (explaining that the doctrine is “particularly applicable where a party attempts to present a different theory on which to decide the case than the one advocated below”). [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm by Stefanie Levine
  Indeed, this case is the farthest this author has seen the Federal Circuit push the 103(a) envelope after KSR. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:47 pm
A third party was using his mark; So, on a court case he chose to embark; To seek the endorsement; Of the mark for enforcement; But the claim was misfiled by the clerk.It's not known whether Andy Clemson knows Mary Smillie (Associate, Bird & Bird), but the first of her offerings makes an allusion to him: There was a young lady called Mandy Who bought a bag from the market - it was handy, Her friends thought - she's rich A Louis Vuitton - what a bitch Until arrested by an… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by PaulKostro
The application of the doctrine of laches depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case and rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:15 pm by Dennis Crouch
In that case, the Supreme Court wrote what looked like a summary judgment decision finding the asserted patent invalid as obvious. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 2:54 am by Liz Dunshee
The EU already requires large companies to report on their sustainability policies – and within the next couple years will also encourage indexes and benchmark providers to disclose their ESG methodologies (see this White & Case memo and this Bloomberg article). [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Bob Ambrogi
Key takeaways: Successful corporate D&I initiatives that can be implemented in law firms How GCs are holding law firms accountable Moderator: Joe West, Partner, Chief Diversity & Inclusion Officer, Duane Morris LLP. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:50 am by Ohio Employment Law Letter
Wobst is an attorney with Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, practicing in the firm’s Columbus, Ohio, office. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by PaulKostro
It is not appropriate merely because a litigant is dissatisfied with a decision of the court or wishes to reargue a motion, but should be utilized only for those cases which fall into that narrow corridor in which either 1) the Court has expressed its decision based upon a palpably incorrect or irrational basis, or 2) it is obvious that the Court either did not consider, or failed to appreciate the significance of probative, competent evidence. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:13 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  New political labels, a new word (prehabilitation) and new ways to think about many things   This issue we are all about voir dire (from multiple directions) and presenting your case in court. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:55 am by PaulKostro
., New Jersey Courts had held that if the parties do not clearly state that they are proceeding under the Act, it will be assumed, in most cases, that the parties are proceeding under the common law. [read post]