Search for: "People v High" Results 4301 - 4320 of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by David Lat
And as a result, you don’t want those people on your jury. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am by Rosalind English
Unattractive though one might find the association’s enthusiasm for human cloning or their utopian vision of society ordered by intelligence, the fact that the majority of people might be shocked did not warrant the prohibition of expression: it is “precisely in the case of ideas that offend, shock and challenge the established order that freedom of expression is the most precious” (Women On Waves and Others v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:59 pm
The occasion for the study was the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  To the extent that the stutter was supposedly a result of internet lag: that was created in an LA home with high speed DSL; many people have worse. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Dame Frances Cairncross led an independent review into the sustainability of high-quality journalism in the UK which was published in February last year. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
An ICO investigation, prompted by complaints from the public, found the firm made repeated nuisance calls to people about PPI. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]