Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 12,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm
Notably, Janzen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 8:13 am
If people can bank and file taxes on their phones, why should they not be able to vote the same way? [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
Thanks to one of my loyal readers who often points out anti-concurrent cause cases for passing along the Colorado Court of Appeals July 24 decision in Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Whether true or not, most people are nervous. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
Thanks to one of my loyal readers who often points out anti-concurrent cause cases for passing along the Colorado Court of Appeals July 24 decision in Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:47 am
And while your at it, have your marketing people talk to your HR people once in awhile. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:45 am
People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, it held in Bowers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 2:46 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am
Security People, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
Steiner v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:13 pm
¹Rose v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:46 pm
It must uphold the principle that the Party builds itself in the interests of, and exercises governance for, the people, and see that its fine traditions and positive work style continue to thrive. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
(If you’re at V&E and fit into one of these case studies, I apologize.)Let’s say you’re a class of 2004 associate at V&E who billed over 2300 hours (the highest level). [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Martinez, No. 06-5502 In a sentencing proceeding wherein the district court applied a four-level enhancement to defendant's base offense level after finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant had used or possessed a firearm in connection with another felony offense, judgment is affirmed where: 1) the district court applied the correct standard of proof to the facts supporting the enhancement; 2) the sentence imposed was reasonable; and 3) the doctrine of… [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
