Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 4301 - 4320 of 44,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
The Federation Council passed the constitutional laws on the annexation of the Donetsk People’s Republic, the Luhansk People’s Republic, and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
Only a few people elsewhere in the courtroom are doing so. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:29 pm by Kevin
Here’s how the terrible decision in City of Parma, Ohio v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:18 pm by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
The case went to trial on May 12, 1969 and the verdict came back in favor of the defendants. 1969 – Borel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The state of Victoria is leading the push to extend the existing defamation defence of absolute privilege to people who make complaints to police and bodies such as anti-discrimination commissions and professional disciplinary bodies. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:16 am by Jonathan Bailey
A very similar case, Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games, dealt with the question of tattoos featured in NBA video games. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:02 am by CMS
The Lord Advocate also addresses the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session in Keatings v Advocate General.3 That case was raised by a pro-independence campaigner who asked the Court of Session to provide several declarators that the Scottish Parliament was able to legislate for a referendum on Scottish independence. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:13 am by Eric Goldman
And yet, many people think the solution is to use the law to mandate “better” content moderation. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The work must be yours, and you may not seek help from anyone else–including attorneys or law students. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm by Aaron Moss
Ironically, that’s the one defense that, per the Supreme Court’s recent pronouncement in Google v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
The first episode, Maoist Takeover, was recorded at William & Mary Law School as part of their Scalia-Ginsburg Collegiality Speaker Series, and focuses on how to engage with people across profound disagreement, as well as on the Supreme Court's shadow-docket decisions in Yeshiva University v YU Pride Alliance. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
The problem is that people believe the fix was in, that this wasn’t an opinion with which most people disagreed, like Brown v. [read post]