Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 4301 - 4320 of 17,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Nonetheless, the ERA did not achieve 38 ratifications, or three-fourths of the states as required by Article V, by the extended deadline in 1982. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
  The Judge begins his opinion by explaining that[t]his seven-count state tort action between non-diverse parties was initially filed in state court but then timely removed by defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm by Joe Patrice
[Huffington Post] * "Judge Feels That Chris Brown's Tour Doesn't Count as Community Service. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 2:06 am
In Christopher Simmons v Derek Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1288, the Court of Appeal amended the guidance given in the earlier judgment of Simmons v Castle [2012] EWCA Civ 1039 by stating that, with effect from 1 April 2013, the proper level of general damages in all civil claims for six specified heads of loss will be 10% higher than previously, unless the claimant falls within section 44(6) of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (the Act).The… [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm by Robert L. Abell
The Court held that Supreme Court precedent, Kirby v.Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972) and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]