Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 8,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am
The fact that the media has latched on to that demonstrates how exceptional that is v. common fannish gift economies. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
With these questions in mind, the analysis devotes special attention to the first case in which the Supreme Court struck down a state law under the Supremacy Clause: Ware v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2014. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:06 pm
Supreme Court (Presser v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Holley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
The case of EEOC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen discusses Young v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:06 am
Kemp & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Daoud v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:34 am
And that brings us to our case of the day, Rochester v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 4:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
Obviously, no one can (or should) go to all of these—young scholars often face significant budget constraints in addition to needing to reserve lots of time to write. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:05 am
" The complaint (full text) in Lavagetto v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm
He added that one way to ensure that only the guilty are convicted is to uphold the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:51 am
In today's case, Murray v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Additional Resources: Marks v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Additional Resources: Marks v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 10:16 am
Here is the opinion in Young v. [read post]
