Search for: "State v. Country" Results 4301 - 4320 of 26,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
The reason for this excitement was that the ECJ said that art.20, of the Treaty, required member states to grant a right of residence to a third country national, who was the primary carer of an EU national, if a refusal to would result in the EU national being forced to leave the EU..More excitingly, this applied to EU nationals who had not left their member state, i.e. it would apply to the parents of British nationals.This, everyone presumed, would mean that not… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
The reason for this excitement was that the ECJ said that art.20, of the Treaty, required member states to grant a right of residence to a third country national, who was the primary carer of an EU national, if a refusal to would result in the EU national being forced to leave the EU..More excitingly, this applied to EU nationals who had not left their member state, i.e. it would apply to the parents of British nationals.This, everyone presumed, would mean that not… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:52 am by John Bratt
Court of Appeals issued its opinion in AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The first step in the case of Louisiana v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:15 am
United States – Officials in 11 states, led by Texas, have sued the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:13 pm by Forrest G. Read IV
Four thousand Liberian holders of Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) status and their roughly 4,000 U.S. citizen children may have to leave the United States because of the decision in African Communities Together v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Based on the principle of territoriality, while upholding the principle of sovereignty, the Supreme Court stated that the ‘no judgment of a Court of one country can be executed proprio vigore in another country’ [para 52]. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
They are one of the most powerful political constituencies in the country. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:17 am by Thomas Kaufman
This morning, in a 5-3 decision (Sotomayor recused herself), the United States Supreme Court issued a pro-arbitration decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:38 am by TJ McIntyre
The background to this case lies in the October 2010 judgment of Charleton J. in EMI v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm by Nicandro Iannacci
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
(After all, some countries, India notably as the paper points out, ban secondary patents for both administrative and substantive r [read post]