Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 4301 - 4320
of 10,079
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 5:24 pm
” Because the domain of application of the E-Commerce Directive (see Article 1(5)(b)) – as regards data protection law provisions – was expressly linked to the Data Protection Directive (DPD) and the DPD only, with its replacement by the GDPR it would thus seem [once again at first glance] that finally data protection law related issues will stop being excluded from the domain of the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:23 am
Rule 41(e)(2)(B), which sets special time limits for executing search warrants directed at electronic evidence, was added to the rule recently and revised last year. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice
Court Denies Rule 59(e) Motion to Reconsider Denial Of Rule 60(b)(1) Motion to Vacate §2254 Habeas Denial
Lugo v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
Ct. 1101 (2015) and FTC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
(amendments are underlined below) Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) (b) (5) (v) was amended to provide that incarceration shall not be considered voluntary unemployment in establishing child support obligations, except in certain situations. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:59 am
The claim for passing off and Section 34(1)(b) and (c) are not dealt with in any detail and are abruptly dismissed as the Section 34(1)(a) claim was not successful, albeit that there are also obvious errors in this part of the judgement (for example at para 69 it states – “The test for passing off with regards to section 34(1)(c) is set out by the court in Laugh It Off Promotions”). [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
§ 785.48(b). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
B. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Walker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Walker v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am
Notice Pleading Restoration Act, S. 1504, 111th Cong. (2009): “Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
Previously, he had headed a State-owned company. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:30 am
§§ 1692(e), 1692d-1692f. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Carle, of the office Thomas E. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:09 pm
§ 1030(a)(5)(B). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Carle, of the office Thomas E. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
G.S. 15A-1444(e); G.S. 15A-979(b). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
(B) BUSINESS DIRECTED TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:43 pm
Martin v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:04 am
"Further, 4 NYCRR 5.3(b), which applies to employees of the State as an employer, provides, in relevant part, that "... when charges of incompetency or misconduct have been or are about to be filed against an employee, the appointing authority may elect to disregard a resignation filed by such employee and to prosecute such charges and, in the event that such employee is found guilty of such charges and dismissed from the service, his [or her] termination shall be… [read post]
