Search for: "State v. Files"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 91,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2009, 9:23 am
Louis Sewer District (District) by the United States and the State of Missouri under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:03 am
See Delgado v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:43 am
Civil litigation — Declaratory judgment for recusal — Failure to state a claim Michael C. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:27 pm
The petitions, filed two years ago, are here. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:33 am
The plaintiffs claim to have served notices of deposition and subpoenas on two out-of-state insurers that were not parties to the case. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:00 pm
In response, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as not permitted by law. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:56 am
Suit was filed in ... [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:12 pm
Appellant Bank of America filed a Complaint and Notice of Lis Pendens against appellee Randel ... [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
He was co-counsel for 29 law professors who filed an amicus brief in Lucia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 5:34 am
Tuel v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:09 am
The case, Murray v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The sexual assault and defamation case that Jean Carroll has filed against Donald Trump has reached the Second Circuit. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:48 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
State of Missouri, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:37 am
The state supreme court's Aug. 14 order (full text) in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:39 pm
And even if your usual job is filing papers, during a riot, we'll need all the beat-sticks we can muster. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
., the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:45 am
Another amicus brief, filed by Nevada and eight other states and co-authored by Ilya Somin, argues that the Wisconsin court’s rule “creates significant perverse incentives for both landowners and regulators. [read post]
