Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 4301 - 4320 of 5,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Interestingly, the question the IPO asked its 'Interests' (in order to advise HMG how it should respond) was different to the question posed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ):Whether customs authorities should detain goods bearing a Community trade mark that are in transit through the EU from a non-Member State to another non-Member State, in the absence of evidence that they will be diverted onto the market in Member States. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 1:51 am by war
Jack Brabham Engines Limited v Beare [2010] FCA 872 [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Click Here EPA, DOJ, State of Hawaii, environmental groups, reach agreement with the City and County of Honolulu to address wastewater collection and treatment systems. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Jason Mazzone
Stevens thought there are good reasons not to hold the states to the same standard of rights that apply against the federal government. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm by pfriedman
After reviewing the rather recent history of the role of a defendant’s bad faith in fair use analysis, Judge Jacobs states rather bluntly: I think that the secondary user’s good or bad faith in gaining access to the original copyrighted material ought to have no bearing on the availability of a fair use defense. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:28 am by Bexis
 It bears noting, too, that the subpoenas duces tecum issued through the Alaskan state court were presumably without legal force in Massachusetts, where Egilman resided and was served. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:21 am by Jon Hyman
It will bear watching to see how federal courts and states other than California react to Reid. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:17 am
She also testified that she did not know the make and model of the vehicle, stating "I'm not good at make and models of cars. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]