Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 8,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
The declaration for invalidity of the RCD was brought under Article 25 (1)(e) CDR, which stipulates that “a Community design may be declared invalid if a distinctive sign is used in a subsequent design, and Community law or the law of the Member State governing that sign confers on the right holder of the sign the right to prohibit such use”. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Manny Pacquiao v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:42 am
In Hatim v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:37 pm
McZeal v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
For that reason, another German court, the Düsseldorf Regional Court, stayed a Huawei v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:46 am
In last year’s much publicized Macy v Holder decision, the EEOC — following earlier court precedents which held that Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination based on “sex” extends to claims for sex stereotyping, as well any other claim asserting that gender was taken into account — ruled that transgender workers are protected under Title VII. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
The Court set out the three factor test noted in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Category: Infringement By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleLifescan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
There is a need for more patent quality in SEPs" he stated. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
It also accused Flexman of breaching confidentiality by stating on his CV that he was assisting the company in reducing its “attrition rate. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:52 pm
., 701 F.3d 1031 (5th Cir. 2012); Morning Mist Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:34 am
Holder, docket 12-1443. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
” On Friday the United States filed an amicus brief in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm
United States Steel Corporation, to be argued on Monday. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
See Brooks v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
Not All Copyright Owners Can Exploit The Copyright By way of context, the Ninth Circuit’s en banc majority opinion in Silvers v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
