Search for: "State v. Mars" Results 4301 - 4320 of 4,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
 Most of them are relatively meaningless or unproductive, in the sense that they barely make factual claims at all, but just state -- really, restate -- vague and contestable value judgments. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:43 am
Prompted by a rehearing petition supported by amicus National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Third Circuit today amended its opinion in United States v. [read post]