Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
Adler) In non-mandate news, the Supreme Court issued two merits opinions today, including Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Frye, Martinez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:30 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:02 am
State of New York view the post-New Deal decisions which repudiated Lochner the way I view Bush v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
In Monday’s oral argument in Astrue v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:22 am
Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
Supreme Court decision in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
Kennedy wrote, and was joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:11 pm
First, in Lafler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
Frye, 10-444 and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
Frye, 10-444 and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am
., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan joined with the exception of a footnote. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Two years ago, in Graham v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
While interesting to constitutional law scholars and state governments, the Court's decision in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
On the other hand, recognizing a general right to counsel in collateral state post-conviction proceedings whenever a claim could not have been raised on direct appeal would have dramatic consequences both with respect to the timing and cost of collateral state post-conviction review (not to mention that it would arguably be inconsistent with the Court’s 1991 decision in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:10 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined with the exception of her first footnote (which stated her view that Congress can abrogate state sovereign immunity pursuant to its Article I Commerce Clause power). [read post]
