Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 4301 - 4320 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
Barney Franks, Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, unveiled The Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act of 2009. [32] “This Act would establish a federal regulatory and enforcement framework under which Internet gambling operators could obtain licenses authorizing them to accept bets and wagers from individuals in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm by Andrew Raff
On Tuesday, December 1, the Supreme Court of the US is set to examine whether lawyers are Lawyers "Debt Relief Agencies" as defined by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(This doesn't seem to go to sponsorship of communications v. sponsorship of products and services.) [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:08 pm by Glenn
It all started at DOJ during the US v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:27 am
How do you deal with employees who end up buying lots of clothes from the brand? [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by Beck/Herrmann
We're talking consumer protection lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies (aren't we always). [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
In reaching that decision, the court opened up the national banks to being investigated by state attorneys general related to violations having to do with state consumer protection laws. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog) Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak) Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation - Deadlock broken on Telecoms… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation – Deadlock… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(Excess Copyright) Bill C-61 and DRM: How the Canadian Constitution ensures a balance of copyrights (IP Osgoode) Counterfeit goods: Statutory and punitive damages: Microsoft Corporation v 1276916 Ontario Ltd et al (Canadian Trademark Blog)   Denmark DRM breaker reports himself to anti-piracy group (TorrentFreak)   Europe Pirate Party gets second seat in European Parliament (TorrentFreak) (IP Watch) File-sharers protected under proposed EU legislation –… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  The most amusing part came when Judge Duval remarked that the arbitration clause “could have been written in invisible ink” in his response to the defense statement that consumers don’t read these agreements anyway so it doesn’t matter. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:52 am
"People don't need regulatory agencies, because the courts will protect them. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by randal shaheen
They must, however, carefully assess the detailed privacy laws and regulations that vary from one jurisdiction to another in order to end up, as Williams-Sonoma did, on the winning side of a consumer claim. - James Speyer and Christopher Tarbell [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Wetlands and endangered wood storks that roost at nearby Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary have been the focus of a twisting decade-long legal fight over the permit for the Mirasol project — and it isn’t over yet. [read post]