Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 4301 - 4320 of 21,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
House of Representatives, the Senate bill would not limit qualified immunity, a doctrine which places limits on a plaintiff’s ability to sue police officers for actions taken in the course of their duties. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:52 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
But we need not test this chain of reasoning because DACA is not simply a non-enforcement policy. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm by Olivia Cross
  Congress later included its own interpretation of the “motivating factor” test, thus superseding this decision, when it passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 8:56 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The court concluded that the facts met the legal test: Ms. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:30 am by Ellen Bublick
In 15 of the 17 jurisdictions that retain a consumer expectations test, Twerski could not find a single case in which the plaintiff did not introduce evidence of a reasonable alternative design. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Josh Blackman
And that fact ought to move the case from Smith's rational basis test to Lukumi's strict scrutiny. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:22 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Further, the plaintiff’s expert affidavit failed to account for the fact that a significant portion of the delay in obtaining a diagnosis was caused by the plaintiff’s failure to undergo testing. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  July 26, 2019: An addendum to the letter agreement was prepared whereby the engagement of services would also include penetration testing of systems and endpoints. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
 One fun fact of the case: One plaintiff worked as a skydiving instructor, until it was learned he was gay, and then his ripcord was pulled and he was fired. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:41 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The Court explained: Tennessee decisions have rejected the proposition that a healthcare liability defendant has a duty to assist a plaintiff achieve compliance or to test whether an obviously deficient HIPAA form would allow the release of records. [read post]
” Title VII uses the “but-for” test to establish causation, meaning a particular outcome would not have occurred “but-for” the alleged cause. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Finally, the employers suggest that because the policies at issue have the same adverse consequences for men and women, a stricter causation test should apply. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:46 pm by April Rodriguez
A subgroup of these people are in for “violent” offenses, which can range from murder to more benign actions like failing a urine test repeatedly. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Finally, the employers suggest that because the policies at issue have the same adverse consequences for men and women, a stricter causation test should apply. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Barnhill, in which the court held that the plaintiff had sufficiently stated a Caremark claim against the board of an ice cream manufacturer, Blue Bell Creamery, that had suffered a listeria outbreak leading to three deaths. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by Russell Knight
“[O]nce residency is established, the test is no longer physical presence but rather abandonment. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am by Eugene Volokh
" … And the court (among other things) pointed to this alternative: [T]he Plaintiffs propose [an] alternative—a voluntary tour [read post]