Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 4301 - 4320 of 55,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 7:52 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting decision Wednesday by N.Y. trial court judge Thomas Marcelle (Albany County), Hines v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:21 am by Ben Sperry
There are no laws against false speech in general, nor can there be, since the Supreme Court declared such speech was protected in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The law applies to permits, licenses, and contracts, and might also be expanded to things like rezoning for development projects, said the bill’s author. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:29 pm by David Greene
But other courts, and some state laws, believe the First Amendment only requires that an objectively reasonable person would perceive the statement to be a threat of violence.The Supreme Court is considering a case called Counterman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
Schooner Amistad, if indeed they referenced it at all, in terms of maritime law and property rights, absent an inquiry into the African peoples whose hardships stood at the center of the case. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm by Christine Corcos
Schooner Amistad, if indeed they referenced it at all, in terms of maritime law and property rights, absent an inquiry into the African peoples whose hardships stood at the center of the case. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, 22-500Issues: (1) What standard under federal admiralty law governs the enforcement of a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract; and (2) whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:31 am by SHG
For example, in her forceful dissent in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Maryland Law Sees This the Same Way This ruling is consistent with Maryland law set forth by the Court of Special Appeals in Mason v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 1:15 pm
It can simply be -- as here -- the thing you stole.Which not only is the law, but totally, 100% makes sense. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
For example, the State of California recently reached a $15 million settlement with the online telehealth provider The Pill Club, which provides prescriptions to people who menstruate based on a “self-screening tool” and short telehealth visits with nurse practitioners. [read post]