Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
Gill v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Silk and Jillian S, Ashley, "Understanding CHina's State Secrets Laws," CHina Business Review (2011) ("China’s state secrets laws can also burden Chinese enterprises that seek to expand internationally. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:49 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:59 am
For the reasons that follow, we hold that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that the children were habitual residents of the United States at the time of the alleged abduction. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:21 pm
LB Harrow v Ibrahim C? [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
United States, testing the sweep — or the narrowness — of a federal law that seeks to protect evidence of crime from being destroyed. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 1:09 pm
I think it’s pretty clear that the United States does not face a hardship if courts decline to rule on prospective Fourth Amendment questions when the United States applies for SCA court orders. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:54 am
But, in this case, “there is no indication that Complainant has sought to challenge [the earlier] decision in a United States court or to otherwise enforce its trademark rights via Lanham Act litigation. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
But the court did not reach the question, resolving the case based on the presumption against extraterritoriality because “all the relevant conduct” giving rise to Kiobel’s claims took place outside the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm
” See Crepage v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Captial One removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California under CAFA. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:29 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A federal judge must still approve the proposal, but three ebook publishers have offered to kick in a total of $69 million to settle an antitrust suit that alleges they attempted to fix ebook prices.Attorneys general of 54 states and the District of Columbia filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 2:34 pm
In Hersch v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:05 am
United States, 323 U. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
A pending petition in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:50 am
Last week in Ward v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Lost in the coverage of high-profile budget battles, the United States Supreme Court has issued three extremely anti-consumer, anti-worker and anti-plaintiff decisions this term that directly threaten our ability to represent injured clients. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
