Search for: "United States v. California" Results 4301 - 4320 of 13,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am by Joseph Fishkin
Basically Alabama is worried that it has done such a good job persuading certain people (or rather, not people, “illegal aliens”) to leave the state that it’s now likely to lose a congressional seat to California. [read post]
26 May 2018, 9:28 am by Sandy Levinson
 (Ask yourself if the United States could reinstitute slavery by adding a new amendment proposed and ratified in accordance with the procedures set out in Article V.)Still, the obvious question is whether such determinations are better made by ostensible "experts," whether in law, philosophy, or whatever, or by "we the people" engaging in what Publics might have called 'reflection and choice" about an issue of fundamental importance,… [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:30 am
Transgender people already face particularly harsh and violent conditions in United States prisons and jails Jeff Sessions’ Department of Justice recently announced yet another attack on transgender people. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
  Privacy Shield The Privacy Shield, like its invalidated predecessor “Safe Harbor,” is an agreement between the United States and the EU that affords companies in the U.S. a framework for compliance with EU data-protection requirements when transferring data from the EU to the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:37 am by Bianca Saad
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that class action waivers contained in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am by Matthew Kahn
United States, to find the Supreme Court explicitly saying that the Fourth Amendment embraced a right to privacy and that the surveillance of a phone call was a "search" within that amendment. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm by Ryan Kunkel and Jim Shore
In a significant win for employers, the United States Supreme Court has issued a landmark decision upholding the use of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm by Ryan Kunkel and Jim Shore
In a significant win for employers, the United States Supreme Court has issued a landmark decision upholding the use of class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements. [read post]
More than 7 months after hearing oral argument on an issue that will affect countless employers across the country – whether employers may implement arbitration agreements with class action waivers — the United States Supreme Court has issued what is bound to be considered a landmark decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am by Mark Walsh
The chief justice (of the United States, that is), then announces that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion of the court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]