Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2010, 7:43 pm
" "I don't give them away easily," he said. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:53 am
If four Supreme Court justices don't understand this formula, why would a jury? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:29 am
The issue may even go to Supreme Court of India and we don't know. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Our firm's philosophy is that if the prosecution isn't offering a good deal, we should go to trial even if our chances are small. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 9:50 am
Without any attorneys’ fees (due to the untimely registration), I don’t see how this ruling can be a financial win for the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:46 am
It would seem as if the competing incentives are judges, who are unwilling to share their power with a jury such that it will detract from their majesty, or prosecutors who want to maintain their discretion (“we’re professionals, don’t try this at home”) but reject the idea that a jury might disagree with their decision that the guy doesn’t deserve to be convicted. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
[An aside: PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, DON'T USE KEYWORD METATAGS EVER FOR ANYTHING. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 12:34 pm
I'm talking about moderate-to-conservative Democrats feeling that they're looked down upon by pundits, by progressives, by other people who say that if they express a feeling that maybe the schools should open, even if the teachers don't want them to, maybe teachers should listen to parents more often when it comes to what they're hearing. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:02 am
"But we don't. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:11 am
In the letters, copies of which were obtained by The Chronicle after HUD formally denied their existence, "I tell you, I don't know anything about any letters. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
" Justice Black simply didn't think judges could do that. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:07 pm
Colloff's article and remembering the facts of the Anthony Graves case: we don’t want to. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Indeed, both of the defendant employers in these cases, like almost all employers covered by Title VII, steadfastly insist that they don't have a policy or practice of hiring only heterosexuals—in part, no doubt, because such discrimination would be unlawful wholly apart from Title VII, but also because very few employers in the nation today would be willing to exclude all gay employees from their workforce: such a policy or… [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
We don't want judges to act as through they were our parents, but people often force them to. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But, as the Eleventh Circuit is somewhat annoyed to remind us once again, a plaintiff can win so long as they have enough evidence to convince a jury, even if they don't have enough to trigger the burden-shift. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
If the judge is on point, even those who don’t agree with the Racial Justice Act – which allows inmates to appeal death sentences on racial bias grounds – as a remedy should heed the call for reform in how capital case juries are selected. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:29 pm
For example, the panel had upheld the action of the cops, explaining that they did nothing in the private driveway of the defendant’s home that neighborhood kids don’t do. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Without the Third Restatement, that doesn’t happen.Just because we said so, however, doesn’t make it so. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:03 am
Don't wet you pants, as there's no indication it's more than a one-off decision. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:00 pm
In Texas state court however, for example, a plaintiff does not have the exclusive right to secure a bench trial, because state procedure says a Defendant has the right to as for a trial by jury as well.The decision on appeal in this case is interesting because most states don't allow bench trials unless both parties agree. [read post]
