Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 9,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in its well-reasoned recent decision in Lawson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
Rawlings v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
In their ruling, the 2nd circuit applied the Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:40 am
Well, maybe--and then again, maybe not. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:48 am
Kostick v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
The city of Washington’s appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:09 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in its well-reasoned recent decision in Lawson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:49 am
Well, I should say that it usually works: Partner: I was in court on the Doe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 5:02 am
The opposite can be true as well: a controversial court decision (Roe, Bush v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:50 am
Indeed, it is well settled that "[a]n attorney has the responsibility to investigate and prepare every phase of his [or her] client's case" (Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453, 453 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
The hearing is likely to be well-attended, and not just by people interested in the Belfast Project. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am
Indeed, it is well settled that "[a]n attorney has the responsibility to investigate and prepare every phase of his [or her] client's case" (Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453, 453 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:46 am
The 2nd Circuit (Cohen v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
CAAF also granted review in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:14 am
The Supreme Court of Canada weighed in on the issue this year in Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 10:40 am
You can review the briefs of the parties, as well as a number of amici that were filed, by following this link. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
D’Amico Dry Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The chambers judge concluded that the 11 contested voters were legally entitled to membership at the time it was granted to them, as a result of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Alberta v. [read post]
