Search for: "Williams v. Williams" Results 4301 - 4320 of 19,655
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
Reviewing the disqualification of an applicant pursuant to Civil Service Law §50.4Hirst v Agrelo, Supreme Court, New York County Part 50E, Index #403004/06, Decided March 16, 2007, Judge William A. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Retirement System excludes expense allowance payments received pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement in determining the retirement allowanceMatter of Maillard v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 57 AD3d 1299Glenn Maillard, John Raptis and John Pidgeon retired from their respective administrative positions with the William Floyd Union Free School District [Albany County].Maillard, a Tier II member of the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System [NYSTRS],… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by Donald Barbati
As reported by the New Jersey Law Journal, the Appellate Division recently issued an opinion in the matter Westphal v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by Donald Barbati
As reported by the New Jersey Law Journal, the Appellate Division recently issued an opinion in the matter Westphal v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
” So this point-a-finger idea is a clear reference to Justice Alito’s suggestion in Williams v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 22 February 2024, Master Dagnall handed down judgment in Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc [2024] EWHC 389 (KB) in relation to an article (“the Article”) first published on 22 May 2021 by Journalism Development Network Inc and written by Mr Daniel Balint-Kurti and Mr William Jordan (“the Defendants”). [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 4:35 pm by Adam Levitin
 One of the opinions she references is a recent order by Judge William Young (Dist. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Konnoth, Legal Research Fellow, The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:58 am by Broc Romanek
While we believe that abusive and misleading accumulation techniques are not immune from liability under existing rules and precedents dating back to SEC v. [read post]