Search for: "v. AT&T Mobility" Results 4301 - 4320 of 5,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am by Larry Downes
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Surveillance Open Democracy had a post “The surveillance industry won’t save us from crises”. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Reference was made to T 641/00 (COMVIK, OJ 2003, 352) and to T 1227/05 (OJ 2007, 574), the latter concerning simulations.In its communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the referring board took the view that the steps forming the claimed method were in themselves non- technical and could contribute to the technical character of the claim only to the extent that their combination interacted with the technical features of the claim to produce a technical effect. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
Google Fallout First filed in August 2010, the Oracle v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Searching for him and his girlfriend, whose safety they were concerned about, police got location information from his provider, T-Mobile, on three occasions in one night. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
(These numbers don't include the federal intelligence agencies, such as the CIA, which do not disclose the size of their legal teams.) [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am by Michelle Buhalo
These tools were designed to help our members jump right into their research.And if you want to take Jenkins with you when you're on the go, we now offer four mobile hotspot devices for two-week loan.Though there are many secondary sources available on our member databases and the library's Lexis and Westlaw computers, we haven't forgotten about those who prefer using print materials. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
 Don’t forget the Union dinner on 4 December 2014 where Charlotte May QC will be reflecting on, in appropriately Christmassy fashion, on IP past, present and future. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Reasonable suspicion" is not required under Texas law except for physical mobile tracking devices like those at issue in US v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:14 am by John Jascob
"We would welcome standardization but aren’t going to wait around for it and miss the boat," she stated.Concluding thoughts. [read post]