Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 4301 - 4320
of 16,217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:03 am
The case is styled, Smith v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
Rand Paul’s willingness to support Kavanaugh after voicing concerns about the judge’s approach to Fourth Amendment digital privacy issues “suggests that in his private meeting with Kavanaugh, the SCOTUS nominee signaled his willingness to take a new view of the Fourth Amendment in light of [the Supreme Court’s recent decision in] Carpenter [v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:58 pm
1 Aug 2018, 7:15 pm
” In its 2016 decision, United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
Smith, Legal Malpractice § 22:5 at 119-122 [2009 ed]; cf. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am
”) Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 7:48 pm
And online at The Deseret News, Rodney Smith has an essay titled “Why overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
The Court in Nanaimo (City) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am
Since PJS, and now also since Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, a new path appears to be being forged for privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 10:36 am
“Readily Achievable” as an affirmative defense Smith v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 1:35 am
Grieving after Wrongful Death I’m Ed Smith, a Vacaville wrongful death lawyer. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:29 pm
26 Jul 2018, 2:05 pm
(Following what I still regard to be the manifestly wrong judgment of the Court of Appeal in Smith v Khan (2018) EWCA Civ 1137 (our note)). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Yet the order (narrowed on appeal to 50 feet, but still unconstitutional) seems to have been based on pretty normal -- if acrimonious -- local political debate. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
In a separate dissent, Judge Milan Smith—observing that “this dispute ceased being a typical employment dispute and metastasized into one of those cases that only Franz Kafka could love,”—argued that the majority’s conclusion was based primarily on a series of highly speculative future professional restraints that may or may not happen (Golden v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Both the federal trial and appellate cases in United States v. [read post]
