Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION "
Results 4321 - 4340
of 8,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2011, 2:29 pm
Instead of requiring action, Congress has sought to encourage it. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm
(As readers might gather, I have no love for the Chinese government, but it is entitled to legal rights in American courts, just as other litigants are, and I respect lawyers' successfully defending those rights; plus of course American courts' attempts to properly apply American law rely on lawyers effectively presenting legal arguments on behalf of their clients.) [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:24 am
And that the only course of action available to them would be to move on, to give up, and – quite simply – to forget. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Resources Code, §§ 21167(b), 21152(a)) and exemption (§§ 21167(d), 21152(b)) are not exclusive, and serve a different purpose than § 21167.6, which aims to ensure meaningful judicial review in CEQA actions. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 5:26 am
The principle remains good law in the Supreme Court, which relied on The Civil Rights Cases to invalidate the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act in 2000.One more word of introduction before I turn the platform over to Douglass: in the speech, he invokes the "intentions" of the framers at various points. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
The court argues that congressional subpoenas are historically based in the practices of the English Parliament and were issued by early American congresses. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 11:40 am
Britain and France, for all their protests against Italy, themselves engaged in actions that were at best questionably consistent with the principles of the league. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Interestingly, the court all but adopts the Third Restatement of Torts §6(c) on this point, The American Law Institute has chosen to categorize the type of claim Appellee has advanced under the rubric of design defect, see RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF TORTS: PRODS. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
by Dennis Crouch Non-compete agreements fly under the radar for most American lawyers. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
According to the White House website, if those negotiations fail to give “American workers a fair deal, then the President will give notice of the United States’ intent to withdraw from NAFTA. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Murray said the fourth case, American Express Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:39 pm
Class Action Waivers, the Canadian and the American Supreme Courts:What is with phone services companies and class action waivers? [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Murray said the fourth case, American Express Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:04 am
But our commitment to Constitutional principles has weathered every war, and every war has come to an end. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
The aforesaid Morgan case demonstrates that arbitration-favored policy has boundaries in the context of American law, taking the form of the equal treatment principle. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
Yet many municipal officials know that the law grants them near absolute immunity from prosecution even though they may violate the Constitution because of the principle of immunity. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 9:35 pm
There is no record to refer to, and the officer can easily offer a benign explanation for his or her actions. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
The insight suggests the blinders of American “serious China hands. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
There was no indication whether the actions violated the Due Process Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, the Establishment Clause, the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 6:06 pm
It was an odd speech--if only measured by the distance between its discourse and the actions of the United States and its allies in Europe. [read post]
