Search for: "BAKER v BAKER"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 4,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
Baker et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
The US Supreme Court today released a very significant decision on maritime punitive damages in the Exxon Valdez case, Baker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:51 pm
A statement from ExxonMobil's Chairman and CEO Rex W. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:11 pm
Legal Newsline writes up the case here, including comments from yours truly.... [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:14 pm
Baker. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:56 pm
Baker) will undoubtedly launch a thousand law review articles over the next few months and years. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:25 pm
While the precedential value of today's Supreme Court ruling in Exxon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:45 pm
Baker decision. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:42 pm
Baker. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
Professor Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog has posted an interesting comment on this footnote (fn. 17) in the Exxon Valdez (Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:02 pm
Baker (07-219), the punitive damages case, is available here. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
It is necessary, in examining what the Court has done in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:22 pm
Baker, No. 07-219 (U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:50 pm
Baker (07-219), the punitive damages case, is available here. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
Baker, No. 07-219, slip op. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
Baker - "on the validity of the $2.5 billion punitive damages award to victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Baker, No. 07-219. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:01 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:17 pm
Baker) this morning. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
Exxon v. [read post]
