Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 7,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:06 pm
, McGowan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
In Gibbons v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:14 am
LeBlanc v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 6:28 am
”In this passage Roy elides, as many others (including those who should know better) have done before her, the historical and sociological differences between the varna model1 and the caste and jāti (‘birth-group’) system. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
The same holds true when you fire an employee for coming to work as a woman because she was assigned male at birth. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
In one case, FDA v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
The new case is Mount Holly, N.J. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Middle- and upper-class women had low birth rates. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am
Cain v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
According to the CDC, which has tracked maternal death using the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System since 1986, the rate has increased from 7.2 per 100,000 live births in 1987 to 18 per 100,000 live births in 2014. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Second, recognizing that fairness also dictates that such notifications be made to the attorneys for all parties, not simply the attorneys for the children, the measure requires that, except in cases involving children freed for adoption, both notices of changes in placement and indicated child maltreatment reports be conveyed to attorneys for the birth parents. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm
Danish ID cards Somewhat to our surprise, we learned this week that the Church of Denmark not only registers births and marriages but also issues identity cards that are valid for secular purposes. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 8:55 am
” See People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
” In Nash v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm
Bertsch v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:02 pm
In Hutton v. [read post]