Search for: "Case & Associates Properties IncĀ " Results 4321 - 4340 of 4,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2009, 12:10 am
The case involves an Establishment Clause challenge to crosses placed on public property by the Utah Highway Patrol Association to memorialize state Highway Patrol officers who died in the line of duty. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:53 pm
So it  sued the NFL, all of its teams, NFL Properties, and Reebok. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:01 am
Pamela Chestek over at her blog Property, intangible discusses the Fourth Circuit's recent decision in OBX-Stock, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Morton Buildings, Inc., 953 S.W.2d at 303, in which this Court held that raw materials that are purchased out of state, incorporated into another product out of state, and then subsequently brought into Texas are not subject to the use tax. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
New York City (1978) 438 U.S. 104); and the County delayed granting the permit for illegitimate, arbitrary reasons under the Landgate case (Landgate, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
In each case, the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) has filed an amicus brief arguing that the TTAB's fraud standards are inconsistent with the elements of common law fraud set out by the CAFC in prior rulings. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) Survey results – Next PTO Director (Patently-O) International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) submission to Special 301 Review (Intellectual Property Watch) (Ars Technica) Outline for today’s ABA-ALI presentation on IP ADR (The IP ADR Blog) US congressional, USPTO officials see Geneva policymaking up close (Intellectual Property Watch)   US General – Decisions 9th Circuit limits the scope of in-term covenants not… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Rule 23(b)(1) cases are relatively rare–the Rule is typically invoked to resolve competing claims to a particular piece of property or an identifiable set of proceeds such that a declaration of one person’s rights necessarily resolves the rights of all other members in the class. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
The California Court of Appeal recently came down with a decision in the case of Ritter & Ritter Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:55 am
The California Supreme Court case Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]