Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 9,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 9:06 am
In Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:40 am
Retail Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
: Liberty continue their excellent Guardian series answering common human rights questions. 16 July | Mousa & Ors v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor: Public Interest Lawyers have won permission on behalf of 100 Iraqis to bring judicial review proceedings against the Government, alleging that they were ill-treated in detention in Iraq at various times between 2003 and 2008 by members of the British Armed forces in breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human… [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:41 pm
Carr, which led to Gray v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:03 am
The judge's comments on spiking are therefore obiter only, but of interest nonetheless.In looking at the position if the liability issues had been governed by English law, the judge reviewed the decision in Phillips v Syndicate 992 Gunner ([2004] LRIR 426). [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 12:07 pm
The article cited State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
Prison policy bars inmates who speak English from receiving correspondence written in foreign languages.In Cotton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
Jurisdiction is jurisdiction.The anti-SLAPP motion basically incorporates the English rule for prevailing defendants when plaintiffs file a lawsuit in response to protected activity. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:17 am
Under English law, each ship has proportionate fault for a collision. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
Mwenya [1960] 1 QB 241 per Lord Evershed MR at 292, citing Holdsworth, History of English Law, vol. 9 pp. 108-125)’. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
” – the English abstract reads as follows: Friedrich Carl v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
* Interim injunctions and preliminary issues cannot be divorced in latest generic pain dispute before Mr Justice ArnoldAnnsley pens of Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz[2016] EWHC 493, which flags up a new generic battle in the English Patents Court and is a helpful reminder to those who may be considering bouncing their opponents into court hearing without proper notice. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The case was Modesto v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:19 am
Stern v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the oral argument for this blog, while I added a preview in Plain English. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Rosalind English will be posting on this later in the week. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Bank v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
See Graziano v Harrisoni, 950 F2d 107 (3rd Cir 1991). [read post]
