Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 4321 - 4340 of 6,606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
Tax Law Assocs., LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Can’t Stop Productions – Can’t Stop Productions asks LA court to deny Village People’s lyricist Victor W [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:08 am by Josh Wright
However, Lundbeck’s strategy to discontinue promoting Indocin IV in favor of NeoProfen can also be interpreted to mean that while Indocin IV was vulnerable to generics, NeoProfen was not, and thus the products are not interchangeable. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:08 am by Jack Pringle
In fact, as discussed over at the Practice and Productivity Blog, "computer" errors are generally the byproduct of human error. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog)   US Patents Attacking 112 support in patent reexamination: CAFC’s NTP decisions (Patents Post Grant Blog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: If the software method is not patentable, then neither is the “computer readable medium”: Cybersource Corp. v Retail Decisions Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Forum-selection clauses are generally enforceable and presumptively valid. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
General American Life Insurance Co., 2003 WL 25481095, at *2 (D. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:16 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the complaint, the asserted patents generally relate to electronic devices with communication capabilities. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:57 am
Claim 2 was a Beauregard claim - a process-by-product claim that essentially claims a method in apparatus form. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:10 am by Matt Osenga
Patent No. 3,000,000 was issued Sept. 12, 1961 to General Electric Co., entitled “Automatic Reading System. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:26 am by Phil
Kinzig, GlaxoSmithKline, and vice chaired by Bart Eppenauer, Microsoft Corp., and Dee Ann Weldon-Wilson, Exxon Mobil Corp, have created an excellent event. [read post]
Generally speaking, a single company’s product cannot be a relevant market for antitrust purposes. [read post]