Search for: "I. C. " Results 4321 - 4340 of 55,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2009, 3:43 pm
Don't forget SCOTUSblog either [SCOTUSblog] * I argued that the confirmation hearings aren't a complete waste of time, but I just spent three days locked in my house watching C-Span, so I could be a little loopy. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Ron
I just wish I could say that practice technology were also ‘new and improved. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:52 pm
It reflects well some of the inchoate thoughts I had as I wrote my prior post. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 8:10 am
  The rule eliminates Forms I-688, I-688A, and I-688B (Temporary Resident Card and older versions of the Employment Authorization Card/Document) from List A. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
In April 2006, I had a law.com essay headlined "Should Congress Mandate Supreme Court TV? [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:59 pm by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
She became very nervous and after a series of questions, she was informed that her visa was refused and that she was inadmissible due to section INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i) and 212(a)(6)(c)(i). [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 5:01 am by Bill
I love the courtroom scenes in it: Jimmy Stewart's Paul Biegler does a fine job of home-boying George C. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 10:42 am
He then cited an example of how C-SPAN used (or misused?) [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Summary of Recent Published BIA Decisions: Matter of Munroe, 26 I&N Dec. 428 (BIA 2014); The Board held that when an alien applies for a waiver pursuant to INA § 216(c)(4)(A) (I-751 waiver petition under extreme hardship theory) the only period relevant for the determination of whether the requisite hardship exists is the 2-year period immediately following the alien’s admission as a conditional permanent resident. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:29 pm by Steve Minor
Code 20-79(c), and I think that there is an increasing bias in some circles that I wouldn't have known about if I hadn't taken an interest against the Juvenile Courts.The reason for this bias among the family law practitioners is because when both parties have retained counsel a dispute over custody or child support is better addressed in the Circuit Court.I'm on the board of Southwest Virginia Legal Aid. [read post]