Search for: "In Interest of Jones"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 7,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm
As the bills temporarily rest in Davy Jones’s Locker, we are left to consider whether the protests were a misconceived overreaction to an important step towards combating copyright theft online or an important step in the protection of the free Internet? [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:56 am
Dow Jones has more on the joint unit of federal and state investigators. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:30 am
Jones, decided on January 23. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm
Jones. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Jones [JML] [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Jones, majority used property concepts in the guise of trespass to avoid problems of what privacy means. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm
For readers interested in a broader overview, try Adam Liptak’s article in The New York Times.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:48 am
The decision effectively overturned Antoine Jones’s life sentence for drug trafficking which was obtained, in part, through the use of location tracking information generated by a GPS device secretly placed by the FBI, without a search warrant, on Jones’s wife’s Jeep Grand Cherokee. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
Jones,(text of opinion) the US Supreme Court voted that it is a violation of an individual's rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures to have a GPS tracking device placed upon his car without a warrant.I'm a little surprised that this decision came out unanimously. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
Jones, Esq. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
Moreover, and making this a much broader ruling than it appears on first glance, unlike Scalia, Sotomayor explains the distinction between Jones and Knotts. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
(Did everyone notice the line-up in Jones v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:12 am
” In perhaps the most interesting opinion, Justice Sotomayor agreed with the majority that a search occurred in this case based on the Government’s physical intrusion on the vehicle Jones was driving, but noted that because the “Fourth Amendment is not concerned only with trespassory intrusions on property” the majority’s test was not particularly useful. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
The real result of Jones is thus not a narrowly held majority about physical trespass. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:57 am
Jones? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
GPS case: The government fared much better than everyone realizes SCOTUSblog Hinckley hearing focuses on whether he has interest in books on assassination Punched By a Cop: Disciplinary Action or Lawsuit? [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:14 am
Orin Kerr over at Volokh has a number of really interesting posts on the opinion, including this one which discusses Scalia's trespass ruling in Jones and this one which raises three questions to think about after Jones. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:18 am
” They range from the merely interesting all the way up to full-blown constitutional crises. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
Jones. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Jones. [read post]
