Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*" Results 4321 - 4340 of 6,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm by Matthew Bush
TexasDocket: 11-777Issue(s): Whether federal due process requires that a criminal defendant be afforded a new trial upon the revelation that scientific evidence necessary to his conviction was or has become unreliable as a matter of law or scientific fact.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Tex. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am by Jeff Gamso
  And as a practical matter, it can't (and wouldn't if it could) scrupulously review ev [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:55 am by Steve Hall
The April execution of Shannon Johnson, a man who “volunteered” to give up all appellate rights and hasten his own death, was preceded by an examination of only two issues: was he “competent” [mentally capable] to give up those rights and did he do so as a matter of “free will? [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:13 am
Section 30509 prevents the owner of a ship transporting people between U.S. ports from relying on a waiver clause to limit its liability for injury or death caused by the owner or its employees, the court found that the matter was not subject to general maritime law. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:11 am by Mandelman
    As a matter of fact, if it’s within six months of the default, and the lawyer takes the blame, the court MUST vacate the default judgment. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:11 am by Mandelman
    As a matter of fact, if it’s within six months of the default, and the lawyer takes the blame, the court MUST vacate the default judgment. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
As a practical matter, now that we’ve put the old ultra vires doctrine to bed, when does corporate purpose ever arise as a matter of law? [read post]
5 May 2012, 5:00 am by INFORRM
He said he discussed the case with Johnson and senior official in 2009 but there was little enthusiasm for carrying it forward. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:03 pm by Daniel Richardson
City of Rutland, 2012 VT 26.In the game of requesting public records there are two interrelated rules.Rule one is that it does not matter who you are when you ask for documents.[1]  Rule two is that makes all the difference in the world who you are asking.[2]  For proof of this second rule, I submit today’s case and its predecessorfrom a few weeks ago. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:58 am by Andrew Ramonas
(SAIC) on cyber security matters, according to a lobbying registration report. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:34 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition Defense, OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal, International Criminal Court Defense, and US Seizure of Non-Resident, Foreign-Owned Assets. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:34 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition Defense, OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal, International Criminal Court Defense, and US Seizure of Non-Resident, Foreign-Owned Assets. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:43 am
With all other options exhausted, opponents of the site have now referred it to Oregon’s Land Use Board of Appeals, the final arbiter in the matter. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:10 am by Don Cruse
The Chief explained that, when advocates have presented a large number of issues, there are often ongoing disagreements among the Justices about which issues matter. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:30 am by Ryan Flax
  Litigation graphics, especially those presented in opening statements (and at claim construction in patent matters), can literally turn the tide for or against your case.I have had the opportunity to practice this “art” in my role as a litigator and collaborate with some great litigation graphics specialists and it is my great pleasure to announce my latest collaboration. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm by Larkin Reynolds
To illustrate MST’s doubtful status under international law, Hamdan cites to a number of law review articles; a report by the Congressional Research Service; and statements of a few Obama Administration officials, including Jeh Johnson, and the former head of DOJ’s National Security Division David Kris. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:00 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0615, 2012 MT 96, MARLA WARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:00 am by Joanna Grisinger
Bringing together politics and race to understand agricultural policies and institutions, Johnson asks, “[w]hen does race matter; and how does race matter when thinking about the shaping of the American state? [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:52 pm by Kevin Funnell
Basiago, and John Edwards for that matter, I’m a lawyer, and if a guy’s a lawyer, you can believe every word his forked tongue articulates, right? [read post]