Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 4321 - 4340 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2007, 6:30 pm
That being said, I think it relevant to note that Brennan grew up in a world typified by John Kennedy's facile speech to the Houston ministers in which he reassured them about the basic irrelevance of any Catholic beliefs he might have held (and his biographers suggest that Kennedy indeed did not take religion very seriously). [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:33 pm
    Since business is good for the largest firms, it might be understandable why they're slow to see the need to adapt on the marketing side. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
In other words, though the Court Kennedy seems to operate on the notion that the risk to health here is minimal, insubstantial, the discussion of this - central to Justice Kennedy's Stenberg dissent and key to further implementation of the "no automatic exception for health" standard - is missing. [read post]
4 May 2007, 9:38 pm
American Cyanamid Co., 774 F.2d 448, 454 (CAFC 1985), but not the demise of In re Deuel (or O'Farrell). [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:34 am
Patently ObviousMay 3, 2007; Page A16 We can't believe we're writing this, but the Supreme Court is restoring some sanity to America's runaway patent law. [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:21 am
Carhart) and, on the other hand, what Justice Kennedy says is available after the decision: a "pre-enforcement, as-applied challenge[]. [read post]
1 May 2007, 9:25 am
Hillary took the call, and Dina said "You're the only person that came to mind when this happened. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
Justice Kennedy did write: "We begin by rejecting the rigid approach of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:37 pm
  Robert Kennedy, the agency's Division of Labor & Worker Safety superintendent, told The Columbus Dispatch "'We're interpreting that you've got to be in both of those [state and federal statutes] to be exempted from Ohio's minimum wage,' . [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 7:02 pm
[Originally posted on DennisKennedy.Blog (http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/)] Learn more about electronic discovery at Dennis Kennedy's Electronic Discovery Resources page. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
  But if we're to productively discuss these questions, we will have to find ways of having far more informed and nuanced conversations than simply pointing to the religion of a particular public actor as if it is conclusive, or even persuasive, proof of anything. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:09 am
  "'We're interpreting that you've got to be in both of those [state and federal statutes] to be exempted from Ohio's minimum wage,' Robert Kennedy, the agency's Division of Labor & Worker Safety superintendent, told The Columbus Dispatch. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 3:42 am
MODERATOR: And, Governor Richardson, we're going to start with you. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
If you are going to cut off the speech, there ought to be a clear line...And you're not giving us one. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
She quickly switches gears to the "they're comin' for Roe! [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
Justice Kennedy sums up my view of the state’s argument with this beaut: JUSTICE KENNEDY: You’re representing the State of California and you want to establish the proposition that any time there is a traffic stop in the State of California or I guess anywhere in the United States all the passengers are free to immediately leave, absent some further countermanding officer — order by the officer. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 11:12 am
But this doesn't really disprove Kennedy's point. [read post]