Search for: "In Re Member of Bar"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 9,028
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 5:35 am
May seems to have a touching faith in the Canadian Bar Association, but others of us have been members of various bar associations. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
His classic approach is appreciated by busy tweeters everywhere: #BLI15 We are learning that Bar members are not buying what we sell in Bar Associations any longer. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:12 am
For example, when the Canadian Bar Association appeared before committee, Conservative MPs did not pose a single question to their representatives. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:18 pm
Inside the Church, and as regards a member diocese, the canons have mostly moral, rather than legal, force. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 am
Tomorrow, I’ll tell you who those talented social-media folks are—and what they’re getting. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
In The National Law Journal, Mauro discusses the case of Howard Shipley and observes that, although the “Court rarely offers practice pointers to the advocates who appear before it,” “it did just that on March 23,when it admonished members of the Supreme Court bar to use “plain terms” when they write briefs. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:06 pm
Some lobbyistsand interested members of the copyright bar have been actively endorsing the Copyright Board’s longstanding campaign for more resources to supposedly solve the extraordinary delay problems at the Board. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
For more information on these and other discounts you’re eligible for as a member of the State Bar of Texas, visit texasbar.com/discounts. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:00 am
Double jeopardy does not bar such a re-prosecution, although it should. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm
We’re located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, California 90028. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:45 pm
That's why they're called "rules. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
But see In re Clinton, 534 U.S. 1016 (2001).Today's list has an interesting item, though. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:07 pm
They're sitting ducks without military escorts. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
In re United States for an Order Directing Provider of Elec. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
If the academy wants to deal with the legal issues at a particularly abstract, philosophical level, that’s great and that’s their business, but they shouldn’t expect that it would be of any particular help or even interest to the members of the practice of the bar or judges. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:27 pm
This case was cited in In re Bond's Estate, Sur., without any reference to the section's coverage and presumably only as authority for stirpital intent on the basis of testamentary language. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
There isn’t much of an epidemic of any type of crime these days, but that only serves to lower the bar on what’s needed for hyperbole. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:05 am
No one expects to see members of the PLA in federal court any time soon. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:36 pm
Paul Tuesday evening through Friday meeting with LexBlog Network members and a few other folks. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Sixteen of those involved were members of the Indiana Tech coed bowling team. [read post]
