Search for: "Interest of Tv" Results 4321 - 4340 of 10,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2014, 12:49 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Especially given that in the main it aims at striking a balance between the interest of landlords and tenants and isn’t just a tenant whinge fest which could more easily be batted aside or ridiculed. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:18 pm by Legal Talk Network
This means having an archive of reasonably up-to-date and interesting information from various sources that can be accessed and used for a legal article, podcast, blog post, or social media presence. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:58 am by David Oxenford
  Both radio and TV representatives have suggested the SESAC be brought under the same consent decrees as ASCAP and BMI. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:13 am by Giancarlo Frosio
Where the problem is relatively simple, as it is apt to be when private interests only are involved, it generally proves adequate. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
The majority recognized that "the Government has a compelling interest in providing an equal opportunity to participate in the work force without regard to [a protected class], and prohibitions on [discrimination] are precisely tailored to achieve that critical goal. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:01 pm by Lydia Zuraw
 Data recently obtained by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) regarding these reports show that there have been 34 deaths linked to energy drinks since 2004, with half occurring since 2012. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
So if the worker and customer disagree even about which TV shows to watch, the worker could be dismissed. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Monday blocked all enforcement of the mandate against an Alabama Catholic TV network, a non-profit entity. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:45 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The World Cup holds little interest for me, aside from the occasional glimpse of impressive Chilean, French, or Honduran abs[1]. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade has an interesting commentary on the divisions in the coverage. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
TV groups cheer Supreme Court’s ruling on upstart Aereo http://t.co/lTw0q8hFAJ -> Aereo: SCOTUS rules its service infringing:   The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in a 6 to 3 opinion… http://t.co/uL8dtml7z8 -> US Supreme Court Rules Aereo Business Model Does Not Get Around US Copyright Law http://t.co/kxLKUrq1ti -> Aereo has lost: Will cloud computing just yawn? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm by Lucy Reed
Not only do they inexplicably fail to use the mandatory phrase “Top Judge”, but they also miss out a lot of the content of a really interesting speech. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 1:18 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Those interested in subscribing to the show can do so via this feed. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Kevin Goldberg
And if you want to see Kevin talking about Aereo, check out his appearance on LXBN TV.] [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:18 am by Mitch Stoltz
An interesting option remains to Aereo as a result of the Court’s new approach. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm
These are just some of the interesting questions addressed in this important new book". [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
  Justice Antonin Scalia, writing the dissent, rejected the majority’s conclusion about Aereo’s resemblance to cable TV services, finding that sufficient technological distinctions existed for purposes of the public performance right and that the majority’s ruling was an “ad hoc rule for cable system lookalikes. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
  Justice Antonin Scalia, writing the dissent, rejected the majority’s conclusion about Aereo’s resemblance to cable TV services, finding that sufficient technological distinctions existed for purposes of the public performance right and that the majority’s ruling was an “ad hoc rule for cable system lookalikes. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm by Jonathan E. Allen
  Justice Antonin Scalia, writing the dissent, rejected the majority’s conclusion about Aereo’s resemblance to cable TV services, finding that sufficient technological distinctions existed for purposes of the public performance right and that the majority’s ruling was an “ad hoc rule for cable system lookalikes. [read post]