Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 5,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
New York has a similar law General Business Law, Art. 9-C,§ 148 (Cyber Piracy Protections; Domain Names). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
They’re having a dickens of a time finding good help. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
Tries to analyze past matters but the data are not very good. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:51 am
Once the parties agree, the exhibits are marked and should go into evidence without the need for authentication of other testimony. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
There are no good metrics. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
European and Community trade mark watchers will probably know that an appeal to the Court of Justice has been lodged in Case C-327/11 United States Polo Association v OHIM. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:31 am
-origin goods to Iran. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
§ 1117(c)(2) for its request of statutory damages for each class of goods sold with a counterfeit mark. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 1553 (June 2008) Geoffrey C. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
With the mandated grading curve system, students are not motivated to learn, but rather, to climb over each other, pushing others down in pursuit of the few good marks the system allows. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 1553 (June 2008) Geoffrey C. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
In other words, this is a bit of a Case C-59/08 COPAD v Dior, isn't it?] [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am
The value of an apology in China (IPKat) An ABC to losing your China IP (China Law Blog) Europe CJEU: Interpreation of Enforcement Directive: Realchemie v Bayer (EPLAW) CJEU confirms validity of case-law regarding distinctive character of 3D trademarks which consist of appearance of product itself or packaging of a good: C-344/10 and C-345/10 (Class 46) Highlights of CJEU decision in PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic C-281/10 (Class 99) EU database of IP… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:38 am
Last week's ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
Back in Europe, Sophie C. van Loon (Kennedy van der Laan) dissects the ECJ's "who pays for the levy on unrecorded media? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
Good articles all - the principal caveat I'd provide is one the paper did as well - it included the false marking cases in some of the statistics (because until this year the court did as well) so be careful about relying on 2010 filing numbers without backing out the false marking cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:27 pm
CONSENT TO REGISTER – SECTION 2(c) REFUSAL Connection with Goods/Services – TMEP §1206.02 The standard for determining whether the individual bearing the name in the mark will be associated with the mark as used on the goods/services is that: (1) the person is so well known that the public would reasonably assume a connection between the person and the goods/services; or (2) the individual is publicly connected with the… [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
C 03-03250, 2004 WL 2445348, *9 (N.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:52 am
Even so, we know that not all are of one mind and that some in good faith will disagree with this decision. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Newton – Hyperlinking is not publication – Implications for Access Copyright’s proposed post-secondary tariff (Excess Copyright) Liberals come out against Bill C-11 due to digital lock rules (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 11: Business Coalition for Balanced Copyright (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 10: Council of Ministers of Education China (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 9: Canadian Library Association… [read post]
