Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 4321 - 4340 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am by Michael Lowe
The retail industry in the United States has yet to solve its growing problem of “retail shrink,” which is defined as “the difference between the amount of merchandise (or inventory) that the retail company owns on its books, and the results of a physical count of the merchandise. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Mark Crosby Nevdahl, and Ryan Allan RauchCase Number: 11-cv-01962 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 10, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-3 SEC vs. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm by Kristin Johnson
This means that the Lanham Act, which protects against trademark infringement, does not apply outside the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Holland & Hart
Mumaugh The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued the long anticipated ruling in the Noel Canning v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on circuits courts' power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte)No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the federal bank fraud case that was also argued last week. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 2013) (a defendant’s Rule 41(g) motion should presumptively be granted if the government no longer needs the property for evidence’) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)).U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:06 pm
"Lawyers for the State of Louisiana asked the United States Supreme Court on Monday to reconsider its decision last month striking down laws that made child rape a capital offense. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
United States, 350 F.3d 299, 306 (2d Cir. 2003); accord County of Erie, 546 F.3d at 229; see also Bilzerian, 926 F.2d at 1292; von Bulow, 828 F.2d at 103; Am. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Defendant Davist appeals from his sentence for false claims against the United States, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and false statements. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]